Page 6 of 8
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:56 pm
by K4TEC
I do know the auction end date, it was just under 4 weeks ago,, I do have the item # etc but there has to be a reason that its not showing up to you as well as others, like I said I see it just fine.
I will not be giving the item #, most people know me and my user ID and the sellers too.
My recomendation would be to contact eBay and ask them all and or any questions concerning it not showing up?
73s
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:24 pm
by k0mu
aa
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:26 pm
by K4TEC
Thank you
I didnt get a chance to see more than the first page, thank you very much for that
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:32 pm
by K4TEC
I only get page 5, if you can instruct me how to get page 1 etc I would be greatful
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:33 pm
by k0mu
aa
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:39 pm
by K4TEC
Thank you page one is enough. very much appreciated
have a good weekend 73s
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 1:06 am
by NJ1K
Oh smarty marty,
You are so full of drama. The way I see it, you're in on the ruse.... Otherwise you would have no problem giving up the auction number (if there really was one to begin with)....
Good night old pal, We both know what is what here, don't we??
73 Nj1K
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 2:52 am
by k0mu
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 4:01 pm
by W4LTD
NJ1K wrote:Oh smarty marty,
...Otherwise you would have no problem giving up the auction number (if there really was one to begin with)....
I have to agree with this, something does smell a little "fishy" here. You cut/pasted most of the [supposed] eBAY auction material, yet you didn't post the auction number; and when repeatedly asked for the auction number, you have been ignoring those requests. What's the deal?
-Rich, W4LTD
And another thing
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 5:51 pm
by NJ1K
I also noticed there is NO feeback pertaining to this "supposed" transaction on either KD6SBR's ebay feedback listings and as well, there is no feedback on Martyn's ebay feedback page either.
As a matter of fact, I didn't see any dealings on the feedback pages of these two with each other at any time.
So, who is fooling who here??
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 8:47 pm
by lhk0pd
And the Mystery deepens. Stayed tuned for the next exciting chapter of who's fooling who..Will the Mysterious E bay item number appear will KD6SBR who has disappeared from all this reappear, watch for the exciting chapters to this intriging mystery. Part of this has been edited and removed per request.
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 10:21 pm
by NM7L
k0pd wrote:And the Mystery deepens. Stayed tuned for the next exciting chapter of who's fooling who..Will the Mysterious E bay item number appear will KD6SBR who has disappeared from all this reappear, is the safe a fake picture watch for the exciting chapters to this intriging mystery.
For the answer to this and other hair-raising posers tune in again:
Same Bat Time......
Same Bat Channel......
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 10:51 pm
by W3WN
k0pd wrote:Well it appears QRZ has deleted the thread as a Hoax.
Radio-Mart, Martyn Allison Scammer?
Started by KD6SBR, 09-08-2011 09:13 PM
Thread deleted by AE1PT
Reason: Apparent Hoax Posting
K4TEC wrote:Put yourself in my shoes, I gave a stranger $2800 and 3 weeks later got a box containing SCRAP,, now if you were to open a box that should have contained a $3000 radio what the heck would you do? oh poor Louis,, yea Right,, like your making it out to be my fault I was conned and still are out $2800
I intend like I have mentioned to persue this to the full extent of the law in every way so this crook cannot do this to anyone else.
OK, so something doesn't make sense here.
If this entire transaction was a hoax, then why is Martyn out $2800?
If only the Zed post was a hoax to cover fraud, why isn't there evidence on eBay of the transaction that allegedly cost Martyn $2800?
And if Martyn was defrauded, why hasn't his lawyer contacted the Zed with a formal request for documentation of the thread from backups, for use as evidence in further legal inquiries?
I'm not trying to cast stones here... and I can easily believe that the now deleted thread, in and of itself, was fraudulent, as it did not pass the smell test on several levels. But this whole thing doesn't make any sense from one end to the other.
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 12:52 pm
by K4TEC
For this and all other questions interested parties may have, I am going to have to refer you to
Kentucky State Police Post 12
Frankfort (Franklin County)
1250 Louisville Road
Frankfort, Kentucky 40601
Phone Number: (502) 227-2221
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 4:39 pm
by W4LTD
Wow, Martyn, all I can say is this is not looking good for your credibility!
I, being someone who thinks you're of decent character, am starting to reconsider my perception of you.
ALL you were asked for was the simple eBAY item number and you gladly posted the text from said auction,
yet continue to avoid the ITEM NUMBER questions.
You are starting to look bad here... I hope I am wrong.
73,
Rich
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 4:52 pm
by K4TEC
W4LTD wrote:Wow, Martyn, all I can say is this is not looking good for your credibility!
I, being someone who thinks you're of decent character, am starting to reconsider my perception of you.
ALL you were asked for was the simple eBAY item number and you gladly posted the text from said auction,
yet continue to avoid the ITEM NUMBER questions.
You are starting to look bad here... I hope I am wrong.
73,
Rich
hihi I find it amusing that it seems eBay has pulled the listing, I find it amusing that there are so many interested parties wanting to know others business,
State trooper Collins i am shure finds it unusual that no one has contacted him regarding this as there seems to be so much interest in this transaction.
As it is a criminal case Rich surely you don’t expect me to comment do you?
Maybe you should ask the other party involved? Or Trooper Collins? You never know they may wish to answer you or anyone else’s questions but I for one will not be answering it despite it being a simple request and if the fact I chose not to answer your question makes me a bad person then I am sorry to see you have an odd outlook of me.
I have provided the State Police details and recommend you contact them.
I have been asked not to comment and that’s exactly what I will be doing regarding this case.
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 7:02 pm
by lhk0pd
Since when have Police departments started giving information to those that are not envolved with the case.
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 7:11 pm
by W4LTD
k0pd wrote:Since when have Police departments started giving information to those that are not envolved with the case.
They do not give such information to the general public.
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 7:15 pm
by K4TEC
k0pd wrote:Since when have Police departments started giving information to those that are not envolved with the case.
I will quote you Larry as your exactly right.
There is a good reason for this and I am following in their footsteps.
What annoys me is the ones who think my non disclosure is a shady thing, nope just pure common sence.
When they are out of pocket $2800 and post something on a forum when a police investigation is under way try asking them a similar question and see what responce they give you.
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 10:50 pm
by W6GQ
k0pd wrote:Since when have Police departments started giving information to those that are not envolved with the case.
EXACTLY!
So why should Martyn give the information here?
It is no-ones business but K4TEC and KD6SBR
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 6:08 pm
by W3WN
W6GQ wrote:k0pd wrote:Since when have Police departments started giving information to those that are not envolved with the case.
EXACTLY!
So why should Martyn give the information here?
It is no-ones business but K4TEC and KD6SBR
Well, since you asked...
KD6SBR made it, if not everyone's business, certainly a matter of public interest when he create the (now deleted) thread over on QRZ.COM. He made it other's business when he invited comments to his original complaint, and then replied to them.
One can not unscramble this egg.
As someone who commented in that (now deleted) thread, I for one have an interest. I'm not asking for a legal blow-by-blow with irrefutable legal evidence. I just want to know if someone tried to snooker us.
Despite the less than savory reputation that Martyn has acquired in many circles, due to many complaints against him & his business practices -- and I am not saying that all is fair, mind you, nor that these complaints and allegations are or are not neccesarily true & accurate -- I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt on this one.
As I said before, the whole thing doesn't pass the smell test. The original thread, the comments about who was emailing whom and demanding what, the allegations of a relative in law enforcement in another state, the type of item allegedly delivered, the disappearance of the eBay listing without a trace... it just doesn't add up.
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 6:41 pm
by W4LTD
W3WN wrote:... it just doesn't add up.
EXACTLY!
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 5:58 am
by N5AL
The Ebay transaction number for this auction was 120764451979
If you type this number into the Ebay search bar, you should be able to see the auction listing that ended on Aug. 16. I remember seeing this auction around the time that it first appeared. The auction might not appear during other means of searching as it is older than 15 days. Martyn can still easily locate the auction because it is saved in his personal Ebay transaction pages, which I think are retained, on Ebay, for 60 days.
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:27 am
by W6GQ
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 2:05 pm
by ke7hqy
Now we're getting somewhere...
It's a matter of he-said, he said in who scammed who at this point.