Thank you for posting this, I feel better knowing that Martyn is on the up-and-up and my apology for not being more trusting of him.N5AL wrote:The Ebay transaction number for this auction was 120764451979
73,
Rich
"Now we're getting somewhere..." I didnt know you had contacted my state police Tony? nor what your involvement in this matter actually is?ke7hqy wrote:Now we're getting somewhere...
It's a matter of he-said, he said in who scammed who at this point.
I'm not involved, that's not my matter.K4TEC wrote:
"Now we're getting somewhere..." I didnt know you had contacted my state police Tony? nor what your involvement in this matter actually is?
Needless to say it is me who called in the state police and are pressing for charges to be filed, so maybe you will reword your post?
You seem to miss the point, What I am asking you is what business is it of yours? there,, thats about as simple as I can put itke7hqy wrote:I'm not involved in this case, that's not my matter.K4TEC wrote:
"Now we're getting somewhere..." I didnt know you had contacted my state police Tony? nor what your involvement in this matter actually is?
Needless to say it is me who called in the state police and are pressing for charges to be filed, so maybe you will reword your post?
Many of us have been asking for an ebay link, and by "now we're getting somewhere..." we now have an ebay.com reference.
none - that's my simple replyK4TEC wrote:What I am asking you is what business is it of yours?
I would love to think that too N5AL,, but there are certain discrepencies to prove otherwise plus the seller didnt insure it for a penny (odd to say the least) thus not drawing attention to a high value item,, The rig despite being sold with the original box was not shipped in the original box,,, there is a bunch of other "stuff" to back me up so despite the nice thoughts this is just not the case,, 73sN5AL wrote:My complete guess on the situation:
The radio got swapped out for a pile of junk somewhere along the shipping chain (or, at the packing company if it was professionally packed). Maybe, the radio was sent in the original Icom box and some dishonest employee saw that it was a high-end consumer product. This thief either wanted to keep the radio for himself, or easily resell it. He repacked the box with junk material to equal the approximate weight of the original radio so that the weight change wouldn't be detectable while in transit, and he could easily hide in anonymity while the buyer and seller point fingers at each other.
Very possible. It's between the seller and buyer at this point.N5AL wrote:My complete guess on the situation:
The radio got swapped out for a pile of junk somewhere along the shipping chain (or, at the packing company if it was professionally packed). Maybe, the radio was sent in the original Icom box and some dishonest employee saw that it was a high-end consumer product. This thief either wanted to keep the radio for himself, or easily resell it. He repacked the box with junk material to equal the approximate weight of the original radio so that the weight change wouldn't be detectable while in transit, and he could easily hide in anonymity while the buyer and seller point fingers at each other.
Thanks for that, Well the way I see it, it is between me (the buyer) the seller and the state police and county attourneys.ke7hqy wrote:Very possible. It's between the seller and buyer at this point.N5AL wrote:My complete guess on the situation:
The radio got swapped out for a pile of junk somewhere along the shipping chain (or, at the packing company if it was professionally packed). Maybe, the radio was sent in the original Icom box and some dishonest employee saw that it was a high-end consumer product. This thief either wanted to keep the radio for himself, or easily resell it. He repacked the box with junk material to equal the approximate weight of the original radio so that the weight change wouldn't be detectable while in transit, and he could easily hide in anonymity while the buyer and seller point fingers at each other.
It has between the buyer and seller since it was first started.ke7hqy wrote:Very possible. It's between the seller and buyer at this point.N5AL wrote:My complete guess on the situation:
The radio got swapped out for a pile of junk somewhere along the shipping chain (or, at the packing company if it was professionally packed). Maybe, the radio was sent in the original Icom box and some dishonest employee saw that it was a high-end consumer product. This thief either wanted to keep the radio for himself, or easily resell it. He repacked the box with junk material to equal the approximate weight of the original radio so that the weight change wouldn't be detectable while in transit, and he could easily hide in anonymity while the buyer and seller point fingers at each other.
k8tj wrote:I have known and dealt with Martin MANY times over the years through eBay. He has bought from me and I have bought from him. We have a good relationship and he is a straight shooter. Martin has always been great about making things right with his customers. He moved off of eBay because of their constant price increases as well as Paypal's fee increase. He was NEVER banned from eBay. The guy is just simply trying to make a living and the last thing he want's to do is piss off a customer. He's been around a LONG time selling used ham gear as have I. If you folks purchase something that isn't right ALL you have to do is email us or call us and we'll make it right. But name calling and bad mouthing a seller because your radio had a small scratch that wasn't revealed is nonsense. If you want perfect equipment, BUY NEW!
--
Tim, K8TJ
K8TJ at COMCAST dot NET
"CW FOREVER"
Hi Darryl, there you go poking your nose in it again and talking about a deal you know only one half of a story, How about you post this on eHam for me... here is my response..WB6VHK wrote:http://www.eham.net/ehamforum/smf/index ... 388.0.html
Hey Martyn, now would be a great time to show everyone what a "stand up" guy you really are and make things right with this fellow ham !
Don how about you go and give back the $12,000 that you owe 7 poor unfortunate hams who you have taken money from and failed to supply equipment to.Donndon wrote:MARTYN,
LETS SEE YOU SMOOTH TALK YOUR WAY OUT OF THIS ONE SEE ABOVE LINK FOR DETAILS IF YOU HAVE FORGOT
And as you well know, no one is forcing an overseas customer to buy from my company right? knowing full well that if something supplied may not be as expected as after all, this is the internet and people buy blind each time they place an order with not only me but eBay, QTH, QRZ etc, so get off my case and realise I gave him a full refund for the product after 3 months which is more than I dare say you or most others would do and thats after I offered him $100 towards getting a speaker only to find now it is back here it was a trapped wire and the radio has been resold.WB6VHK wrote:Martyn:
There are always two ( maybe more ) sides to every story...The problem with you is that so many overseas hams seem to say the exact same thing in their dealings with you. ( item not nearly as described, not working, ect... )
You know FULL WELL how much they have to pay for shipping so you conveniently say " send it back at your expense" for a refund. From what I have read most just bite the bullet and keep the equipment.
As I said Martyn, now would be a great time to show everyone here on Eham ( and the whole world what a swell guy you really are and make it right with this fellow ham who trusted you from halfway around the world. Why is it ALWAYS the other guys fault when a deal goes sour with you ? In my opinion its not too professional. ( you want to be seen as a professional business right ? )